![]() The Steele dossier was a set of reports written by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence agent whose research firm was a subcontractor that Fusion GPS hired to look into Mr. The Washington Examiner earlier reported on the commission’s letter to Mr. Campaign spending disclosure reports described most of those payments to Perkins Coie as having been for “legal services” and “legal and compliance consulting.” The commission documents said Perkins Coie - where a partner at the time, Marc Elias, was representing the Clinton campaign - paid Fusion GPS slightly more than $1 million in 2016, and the law firm was in turn paid $175,000 by the campaign and about $850,000 by the party during six weeks in July and August 2016. Nevertheless, the documents said, the campaign and the party agreed in February to pay civil penalties totaling $113,000 - $8,000 from the campaign and $105,000 from the party - to resolve the matter “expeditiously and to avoid further legal costs.” The agreements said the campaign and the party did not concede that the Federal Election Commission was correct that they probably violated campaign finance law but “will not further contest” that finding either. They argued that the research Perkins Coie had commissioned was part of the legal services the law firm provided, including “in anticipation of litigation.” Backer showed that the campaign and the party disagreed that they had inaccurately described the purpose of their spending. So-called conciliation agreements attached to the letter sent to Mr. ![]() But Daniel Wessel, a Democratic National Committee spokesman, said in a statement, “We settled aging and silly complaints from the 2016 election about ‘purpose descriptions’ in our F.E.C. Graham Wilson, a lawyer representing both the campaign and the party in the matter, did not respond to a request for comment. The letter said the commission agreed that the campaign and the party had probably violated campaign finance law. Backer on Tuesday, which he posted on his group’s website. But the agency sent a letter about the inquiry and its resolution to Mr. The commission has not yet made public the findings of its investigation. It accused the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party of illegally hiding that they had been funding an opposition research effort. In campaign spending disclosures, the campaign and the party said their payments to Perkins Coie were for legal services, not opposition research.ĭan Backer, a conservative lawyer, filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission on behalf of a group he leads, the Coolidge Reagan Foundation. Trump and Russia that resulted in a discredited document known as the Steele dossier.ĭuring the 2016 race, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee retained a law firm, Perkins Coie, which in turn hired a research group, Fusion GPS, that commissioned what became the dossier. ![]() WASHINGTON - Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic Party have agreed to pay $113,000 in fines to settle a Federal Election Commission investigation into whether they violated a campaign finance disclosure law when they funded an opposition research effort into Donald J. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |